View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sudokuEd Grandmaster

Joined: 19 Jun 2006 Posts: 257 Location: Sydney Australia
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:29 am Post subject: 23 January X-treme - JOAX! |
|
|
Been lots of very high rating X-files for January - this X-treme from 23 Jan is the highest at 37000+. So have dubbed this JOAX.
History demands we give it a whirl .
From here: [edited to fix mistake in code referred to in following posts]
Code: | .------------------------.------------------------.------------------------.
| 2 35678 3578 | 4 35678 68 | 3567 1 9 |
| 45678 1 34578 | 2 356789 689 | 34567 45678 34 |
| 9 345678 34578 | 35678 35678 1 | 24567 2345678 234 |
:------------------------+------------------------+------------------------:
| 467 234567 234579 | 359 234569 246 | 1 234569 8 |
| 14568 234568 1234589| 35689 458 7 | 234569 234569 234 |
| 4568 234568 234589 | 1 2345689 489 | 234569 234569 7 |
:------------------------+------------------------+------------------------:
| 4578 9 24578 | 678 24678 2468 | 347 2347 1 |
| 1478 2478 6 | 789 124789 3 | 2479 479 5 |
| 3 247 1247 | 79 12479 5 | 8 2479 6 |
'------------------------'------------------------'------------------------' |
1. no 2 in r 4c8
1a. 2 in r4c6 -> no 2 in r4c8
1b. 2 in r7c6 -> 2 in D/ in r3c7 or r8c2 -> cross-over: no 2 in r8c7 -> 2 in n9 in r9c8 -> no 2 in r4c8
2. no 2 in r7c3
2a. 2 in r7c6 -> no 2 in r7c3
2b. 2 elsewhere in n8 only in c5 -> 2 in D/ in r4c6 -> no 2 in r7c3
3. 2 cannot be in r9c5
3a. means 2 in both r8c2 and r4c6: 2 2's in D/
4. no 5 in r46c5
4a. 5 in r3c4 -> 5 in D/ in r5c5 -> no 5 in r46c5
4b. 5 elsewhere in n2 in c5 -> no 5 in r46c5
5. no 8 in r6c1
5a. 8 in r2c8 -> 8 in r78c1 -> no 8 r6c1
5b. 8 in r3c8 -> 8 in D\ in r5c5 or r6c6.
5c. from 5b. 8 in r5c5 -> 8 in r78c1 -> no 8 r6c1
5d. from 5b. 8 in r6c6 -> no 8 in r6c1
Last edited by sudokuEd on Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Para Yokozuna

Joined: 08 Nov 2006 Posts: 384 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
37.000+??? how the hell do you get a puzzle to a 37000+ rating? That can seriously not be good for our health. Let's see what we can make of this.
Para |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rcbroughton Expert

Joined: 15 Nov 2006 Posts: 143 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi guys
taking a break from Ed's killer - not really sure what 37000 means, except we're probably expecting some nasty moves ahead?.
Anyway here's a couple of quick moves for you:
[Edited to reflect Para picking up I'd missed a "5" at r5c5]
no longer valid
6. No 5 in r3c4
6a. r3c4=5 -> r3c3<>5 => r4c4=5 (D\) -> r3c4<>5
7. 5 lnow locked in N2 for c5
8. no 5 at r4c1
8a. r4c1=5 -> r7c1<>6 -> r7c3=5 -> r3c3<>5 => r4c4=5 -> r4c1<>5
no longer valid
9. no 5 at r4c3
9a. r4c3=5 -> r3c3<>5 => r4c4=5 (D\) -> r4c3<>5
10. no 8 at r3c3
10a Placing 8 at r3c3 eliminates all candidates for 8 in column 8
10b. r3c3=8-> r3c8<>8
10c r3c3=8-> r3c3=8 -> r5c5=4 -> r6c6=9 -> r8c8=7 -> r7c7=3 -> r4c4=5 -> r7c6=4 -> r7c8=2 -> r4c6=2 -> r8c2=8 -> r2c8<>8
10d. no other cells with 8 in column 8
11. 8 now locked for D\ in n5
12. Placing 8 at r3c4 forces 2 cells to 9 in row 8
12a. r3c4=8 -> r8c4={79}, r2c8=8 -> r5c5=4 -> r8c8 = {79}
12b. r3c4=8 -> r1c6=6, r2c8=8 -> r5c5=4 -> r4c6=2 ->r8c2=7 -> r8c48 both forced to 9
13. placing 2 at r3c7 leaves no 2 in n5 or c6
13a. r3c7=2 -> r4c6<>2, r8c27<>2 -> r8c5=2 -> r6c5<>2, r7c6<>2
14. no 2 at r4c2
14a. r4c2=2 -> r4c6<>2 => r8c2=2 -> r4c2<>2
Richard
Last edited by rcbroughton on Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Para Yokozuna

Joined: 08 Nov 2006 Posts: 384 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There seem to be some typo's in your code Ed. There are still 9's in R1, C9, N3 and D/.
And i wondered about the 5 in R4C1 but i see how it works over D\ now.
Now to find somethings useful.
Para |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Para Yokozuna

Joined: 08 Nov 2006 Posts: 384 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rcbroughton wrote: |
6. No 5 in r3c4
6a. r3c4=5 -> r3c3<>5 => r4c4=5 (D\) -> r3c4<>5
|
5 can be in R5C5, right on D\? and then there is no contradiction
This messes up a few of your moves. 7, 9, 10 and 11 don't work now.
8 and 12-14 are still ok.
rcbroughton wrote: | 12. Placing 8 at r3c4 forces 2 cells to 9 in row 8
12a. r3c4=8 -> r8c4={79}, r2c8=8 -> r5c5=4 -> r8c8 = {79}
12b. r3c4=8 -> r1c6=6, r2c8=8 -> r5c5=4 -> r4c6=2 ->r8c2=7 -> r8c48 both forced to 9
|
for 12 you need a small edit
12a. r3c4=8 -> r8c4={79} -->> R7C4 = 6 -->> R45C4= {35} -->> r2c8=8 -> r5c5=4 -> r8c8 = {79}
Para |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Para Yokozuna

Joined: 08 Nov 2006 Posts: 384 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
15. No 3 in R3C8 because of 3's in C4
15a. R3C4 = 3 --> no 3 in R4C8
15b. R4C4 = 3 -->> R7C8 = 4 --> no 3 in R4C8
15c. R5C4 = 3 -->> R23C9 = 3 --> no 3 in R4C8 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rcbroughton Expert

Joined: 15 Nov 2006 Posts: 143 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Para
thanks - I clearly transposed something wrong from Ed's code - I ended up without a 5 at r5c5.
I'll edit my post - only steps 8, 13 and 14 valid at this point.
I also noted a few odditied in Ed's codes - so, to summarise up to end of move 15 - but not including 6,7,9,10,11,12 - I think that leaves us here.
Code: | .-------------------------------.-------------------------------.-------------------------------.
| 2 35678 3578 | 4 35678 68 | 3567 1 9 |
| 45678 1 34578 | 2 356789 689 | 34567 45678 34 |
| 9 345678 34578 | 35678 35678 1 | 4567 245678 234 |
:-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------:
| 467 34567 234579 | 359 23469 246 | 1 34569 8 |
| 14568 234568 1234589 | 35689 458 7 | 234569 234569 234 |
| 456 234568 234589 | 1 234689 489 | 234569 234569 7 |
:-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------:
| 4578 9 4578 | 678 24678 2468 | 347 2347 1 |
| 1478 2478 6 | 789 124789 3 | 2479 479 5 |
| 3 247 1247 | 79 1479 5 | 8 2479 6 |
'-------------------------------.-------------------------------.-------------------------------' |
That leads me to one next move:
16. No 7 at r7c5 - placing 7 at r7c5 eliminates all candidates for 7 in D/
16a r7c5=7 -> removes 7 from D/ at r7c3
16b r7c5=7 -> r9c4=9 -> r8c4=8 -> r7c4=6 -> r3c4=7 -> r8c8=7 -> removes remaning 7's from D/ at r8c2 and r2c8 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Para Yokozuna

Joined: 08 Nov 2006 Posts: 384 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
12 still works if you use the edit i posted. so that one should remain valid. Because the edit eliminates the 5 from R5C5 so the rest of the steps are still valid so the 8 can be removed from R3C4.
12. Placing 8 at r3c4 forces 2 cells to 9 in row 8
12a. r3c4=8 -> r8c4={79} -->> R7C4 = 6 -->> R45C4= {35} -->> r2c8=8 -> r5c5=4 -> r8c8 = {79}
12b. r3c4=8 -> r1c6=6, r2c8=8 -> r5c5=4 -> r4c6=2 ->r8c2=7 -> r8c48 both forced to 9
Para |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rcbroughton Expert

Joined: 15 Nov 2006 Posts: 143 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Para
agreed! 8 comes out of r3c4 - my move 12 doesn't work but your move 12 does. Credit to you for seeing a more complex move. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|