Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:52 am
by Jean-Christophe
deleted

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:55 am
by Para
Jean-Christophe wrote:How didn't I see the move 68 !
I was wondering the same thing after some moves you came up with. But sometimes we just overlook the easy when we are doing difficult things. Guess it's just a question of overthinking things.

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:21 pm
by rcbroughton
Para wrote:Must be something nicer here.
79. R13C3 = [16/34/43]
Don't know whether I've followed your moves correctly - but when I get to your step 79, I see 8 locked in r7c23 for the nonet - > this gives you the naked 6 at r7c7 directly.

Rgds

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:55 pm
by Para
rcbroughton wrote:
Para wrote:Must be something nicer here.
79. R13C3 = [16/34/43]
Don't know whether I've followed your moves correctly - but when I get to your step 79, I see 8 locked in r7c23 for the nonet - > this gives you the naked 6 at r7c7 directly.

Rgds
I think you are missing the 8 in R9C1

Para

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:16 pm
by rcbroughton
Para wrote:I think you are missing the 8 in R9C1
Ah yes. Thanks - I misread your step 74.

Rgds
Richard

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:49 pm
by Para
I am sorry i said TJK 31 was easy. I completely forgot Ruud's has a vindictive side.


Para